The Business Word, Inc. thebusinessword (atty) yahoo.com bwikeys.jpg
 
 
Follow RealDonJohnson on Twitter
Home
Weblog
   

Links to Colorado Candidates, Initiatives

US Senate
Michael Bennet
Michael Bennet Wrong for Colorado
Ken Buck
Governor
Dan Maes
John Hickenlooper
Tom Tancredo
Jason Clark
US House
Diana DeGette (CD 1)
Mike Fallon (CD 1)
Stephen Bailey (CD 2)
Jared Polis (CD 2)
John Salazar (CD 3)
Scot Tipton (CD 3)
Cory Gardner (CD 4)
Betsy Markey (CD 4)
Kevin Bradley (CD 5)
Doug Lamborn (CD 5)
Mike Coffman (CD 6)
John Flerlage (CD 6)
Ryan Frazier (CD 7)
Ed Perlmutter (CD 7)
Attorney General
John Suthers
Stan Garnett
Secretary of State
Bernie Buescher
Scott Gessler
Treasurer
Cary Kennedy
Walker Stapleton
Courts
Clear the Bench Colorado
Ballot Initiatives
No 62
Proposition 101 Car Taxes
Amend. 60. Limit Property Taxes
Amendment 61 Limit Colo. Debt
No on 60, 61, 101
Amend. 63 No ObamaCare
Colorado Senate
Colo. Senate GOP
Colorado House

Articles by Donald E. L. Johnson

About Us
  What We Do  

 Syndicate
  RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0
Atom
Add to My Yahoo
 
[Valid RSS] [Valid Atom]
 

HUM and CI: Stock picker’s at Goldman Sachs like Humana better than Cigna

Goldman Sachs’ posted a note on Barron’s web site that says the firm’s stock pickers like Humana (HUM) better than Cigna (CI), but it still has buy recommendations on both stocks.

The firm’s stock research has convinced its analysts that, “Humana’s earnings are primarily driven by Medicare Advantage, where fundamentals remain strong and should drive solid second-quarter earnings as well as a solid outlook for next year. We’ve gained greater confidence that the earnings hit to 2008 is behind us and contained to the Medicare drug-plan business, a key positive if it proves out since Medicare drug-plan benefits are fully reset on an annual basis, which could drive $1.00 upside to our current 2009 EPS estimate of $5.10.”

Daily charts for HUM and CI and their close competitors are here.

Stock market timers and technical analysts will be interested in these point and figure charts. They show that HUM, WLP, HNT and CVH have bullish price objectives, which should be treated as guides, not predictions. CI and UNH have bearish price objectives.

Full Disclosure: I don’t have positions in any of these stocks.

For educational purposes only. Investigate stocks on Reuters.com, Yahoo.com and Google.com. Also, search the web for information. And read your local papers, which cover companies based in your state and area as well as anyone. That gives local investors an edge, if they know what to look for.

Posted by Donald E. L. Johnson on 05/21/2008 at 08:07 PM

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

<< Back to main